In the world of running shoes, the Saucony Guide 19 and Asics Gel-Kayano 33 are two stability shoes that have been making waves. But which one is the better choice for your runs? As a gear editor, I've had the pleasure of testing both of these shoes and can tell you that they cater to different runners with specific preferences. In this article, I'll break down the key features of each shoe and offer my personal perspective on which one is right for you. So, if you're looking for a new daily trainer, keep reading to find out which shoe is the best fit for your needs.
The Fit Factor
When it comes to fit, the Saucony Guide 19 and Asics Gel-Kayano 33 are both designed to accommodate a wide range of foot shapes and sizes. However, there are some subtle differences that can make a big difference in how the shoes feel on your feet. For those with wide feet, the Guide 19 is a great choice. Its broad platform and asymmetric geometry provide a secure and supportive fit, without feeling too squeezed or cramped. The shoe's max-cushioning underfoot also helps to prevent over-correction and provides a smooth ride.
On the other hand, the Gel-Kayano 33 has a slightly looser fit in the heel area, which can be a plus for those with high insteps. The looped eyelet lacing system provides a secure but not constrictive fit, and the looped pull tab makes putting on the shoes a breeze. However, for those with bunions or pinky toes, the Guide 19's rounder toe area may be a better fit. The shoe's toe box is designed to prevent friction and provide extra space, which can be a game-changer for those with foot issues.
The Ride Factor
When it comes to ride, the Saucony Guide 19 and Asics Gel-Kayano 33 are both stability shoes, but they offer very different experiences. The Guide 19's Pwrrun foam provides a firm but plush ride, with some give when you run in the shoe. The foam molds to your foot, providing support and cushioning without feeling too soft or disconnected from the ground. However, the ride isn't as responsive as other daily trainers, and the shoe's neutral counterpart, the Ride 19, has more rebound due to its TPU-based Pwrrun+ foam.
The Gel-Kayano 33, on the other hand, has a dual-density midsole with EVA-based FF Blast Plus and POE-based FF Blast Max foams. The result is a ride that feels like you're running on denser, more durable TPU foam. The cushioning is slightly firmer and bouncier, providing a responsive and stable ride. Testers were surprised at how light the shoe felt, and many found it to be a great choice for long runs or track workouts.
So, Which Shoe Is for You?
Ultimately, the choice between the Saucony Guide 19 and Asics Gel-Kayano 33 comes down to personal preference and running style. If you're a runner with a smaller stature who needs more give when it comes to max-cushioning, the Guide 19 is a great choice. Its broad platform and asymmetric geometry provide a secure and supportive fit, and the shoe's toe box is perfect for those with bunions or pinky toes. However, if you have harder footfalls or need more density underfoot for support, the Gel-Kayano 33 is a great option. Its dual-layer midsole and Asics' PureGel in the heel area provide a responsive and stable ride, making it a great choice for hour-plus treks on the road.
In my opinion, both shoes are excellent choices for stability runners, but they cater to different needs. The Guide 19 is a great choice for those who want a cushier trainer during long runs, while the Gel-Kayano 33 is a great option for those who want a firmer feel and more bounce. Ultimately, the best way to decide which shoe is right for you is to test them out for yourself and see which one feels like the perfect fit.